Timeline for Additional Badge Ideas
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 10:53 | comment | added | Georg Fritzsche | I would add a minimum score on the answer (e.g. 3) to prevent too easy gaming. | |
| Oct 24, 2009 at 0:18 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Last paragraph made simpler. Minor edit: grammar/spelling/case/punctation/etc.
|
| Jul 29, 2009 at 20:57 | comment | added | sal | @Graeme Perrow maybe that badge should be called beat-skeet? | |
| Jul 21, 2009 at 13:55 | comment | added | Damien | Oh, he'll find a way... | |
| Jul 21, 2009 at 12:49 | comment | added | Graeme Perrow | Interesting idea: a badge that Jon Skeet can't get! | |
| Jul 14, 2009 at 19:12 | comment | added | Quinn Taylor | @devinb I doubt people intentionally gives lousy answers on SO. This badge would be likely to incentivize users with less rep to post good answers in the hope of earning a badge for giving a better answer than a much more experienced/reputable user. I can't really see a downside to something like this... | |
| Jul 14, 2009 at 13:10 | comment | added | devinb | (-1) On SO, everyone should be giving the best answer they can. We shouldn't be operating on a 'tier' system. You should answer a question when you think no one else has it right, their reputations should not matter. | |
| Jul 13, 2009 at 13:39 | comment | added | KyleFarris | I like the name "underdog" as well. | |
| Jul 11, 2009 at 11:13 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Jeff Atwood | ||
| Jul 5, 2009 at 3:12 | comment | added | user95071 | Needs to be called "Grasshopper" | |
| Jul 1, 2009 at 7:58 | comment | added | Daniel James | I wouldn't just use a plain multiple - as it'd be too easy to get the badge when you've got a small reputation, so I might use 'x * reputation + c' or perhaps 'max(x * reputation, c)', and I'd make 'c' pretty large. | |
| Jul 1, 2009 at 3:20 | comment | added | gnostradamus | "... submitted by something with x amount times more reputation than you"??? Are you implying that inhuman creatures are infiltrating SO? =) | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:13 | history | edited | Damien | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 176 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 19:12 | comment | added | Damien | Just a joke, I'll change it. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 17:57 | history | edited | Damien | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 135 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 17:53 | comment | added | Damien | Nice, I like Underdog | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 16:40 | comment | added | Quinn Taylor | Apple's WWDC has a traditional panel called "Stump the Experts". Maybe something like "Smart Upstart" or "Underdog"? | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 11:43 | comment | added | Sampson | While skeet is a great guy, I don't think the community should ever start operating around his persona. | |
| Jun 30, 2009 at 11:40 | history | edited | Damien | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 202 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2009 at 9:04 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | And makes a lot of badges. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 19:30 | comment | added | Damien | last one is good, makes it more serious as well. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 19:20 | comment | added | Daniel James | You could award it for when a rival answer was submitted by someone with a much higher reputation than your own. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:07 | comment | added | Damien | It was more of a fun idea ;) | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 12:55 | comment | added | Jon Smock | This is somewhat dependent on Jon Skeet always being a prominent user, right? Not that it doesn't appear that way - just playing devil's advocate. | |
| Jun 28, 2009 at 19:22 | history | edited | Damien | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Jun 28, 2009 at 17:14 | history | answered | Damien | CC BY-SA 2.5 |