Timeline for Split reputation into trust and expertise
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2016 at 23:52 | history | edited | Issa Chanzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 178 characters in body
|
Nov 26, 2015 at 0:00 | comment | added | Issa Chanzi | I suppose that the real benefit is that it would be easier to start out on stack exchange because you have to build your first 200 rep on one site before you really get involved in others. Maybe a smaller association bonus at 25 rep for new users? | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 14:24 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 30, 2015 at 19:39 | |||||
Sep 30, 2015 at 13:17 | history | edited | Fish Below the Ice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed spelling, grammar
|
Sep 30, 2015 at 13:15 | answer | added | Fish Below the Ice | timeline score: 14 | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 10:46 | comment | added | Meta Andrew T. | I believe I have read similar feature request like this somewhere, and it was also downvoted to oblivion, but I couldn't find it... also, this case might be a counter-argument to why this request is okay. | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 9:57 | comment | added | Robert Longson | Neither asking, nor answering require rep currently. Are you suggesting they should? You'd need to show where every privilege would fit and why your proposal would be better than the status quo for it to be a useful question. Why does stackexchange need to be less restrictive for instance? | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 9:26 | comment | added | yannis | Ok, I couldn't resist. Enjoy your bonus. ;) | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 9:22 | comment | added | yannis | You are 10 rep away (on Stack Overflow) from earning the association bonus. When that happens, you'll automatically get access to basic privileges across the network. Good enough? | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 9:02 | answer | added | user306364 | timeline score: 12 | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 8:56 | comment | added | JonW | I don't really see any benefit to this, at least not in the way you have described. The ability to ask questions, comment or answer questions requires such a minimal amount of reputation that it's not difficult to achieve on any site that you want to be a part of. What is the actual benefit to both the User (i.e. you) and to the site(s) to split reputation into different types as you suggest? | |
Sep 30, 2015 at 8:51 | history | asked | Issa Chanzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |