Timeline for How should low-reputation MSE users express disagreement with a (proposed) network-wide change?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 at 13:43 | comment | added | Andy | The extra work required to post means that not everyone will post, no. However, if someone can compose a brief paragraph (at least) explaining why they don't agree it does help to further convey a sense of disagreement than simply voting. Just like politicians are known to ignore "low effort" activities, but will respond to letters to the editor and other activities that take effort, this is the same. I can see over 400 people voted on the MIT discussion, but I also see there are nearly 50 people that have something important to say. Of that, a decent portion disagrees with the proposal. | |
| Dec 18, 2015 at 13:39 | comment | added | Patrick Hofman | One could go through all answers, and up-vote those he agrees with, but simply down-voting the question seems the simplest way... | |
| Dec 18, 2015 at 13:38 | history | answered | Andy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |