Timeline for Message for upvotes is misleading
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2017 at 20:16 | comment | added | John Militer | You proposal was accepted | |
| Aug 18, 2016 at 15:47 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 15, 2016 at 17:55 | comment | added | Patrick Hofman | Sorry I can't help it. I would love to fix it myself... | |
| Aug 15, 2016 at 16:58 | comment | added | user311528 | :/ looks like 100 more rep incoming | |
| Dec 28, 2015 at 22:01 | comment | added | user311528 | I accepted your answer, but I will change the accepted answer when the tooltip is changed and they post that here. | |
| Dec 27, 2015 at 1:49 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=311528 by developer User.Id=141525 | |
| Jan 13, 2017 at 17:38 | |||||
| Dec 26, 2015 at 21:25 | comment | added | Shog9 | As a way to make the basic mechanics of the system - earn rep to vote - a bit more discoverable. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 20:57 | comment | added | Patrick Hofman | Okay. Got that @shog9. Why is the feedback / vote message even shown? What was the reason for that? | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 20:52 | comment | added | Shog9 | I sympathize with the intent, but I'm not sure that explicitly calling it a vote makes this less misleading, particularly since there's currently no easily-obtainable record of these "votes" the way there is for real votes (consider that a user with 20 rep would be able to find all of the posts he'd upvoted in his profile, but would see anything "downvoted" suspiciously absent in spite of the claims that they are remembered). I suspect it'll be hard to avoid problems in a terse message without actually changing what anon feedback does... | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 1:59 | comment | added | The Guy with The Hat | The problem is that there's a delicate balance between informationality and conciseness. Personally, I think the best would be a very concise message with link to further explanation. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 0:16 | comment | added | Patrick Hofman | Tried to remove some content. Hope it is better now @the | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 0:14 | history | edited | Patrick Hofman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2015 at 0:02 | comment | added | Patrick Hofman | I can agree on that. How would you shorten it and still make clear what their vote actually did? | |
| Dec 25, 2015 at 23:56 | comment | added | The Guy with The Hat | I think that message isn't really concise enough. | |
| Dec 25, 2015 at 23:43 | history | answered | Patrick Hofman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |