Timeline for A New Code License: The MIT, this time with Attribution Required
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 14, 2016 at 20:24 | comment | added | user136089 | "I'll just contine assuming the chosen license is MIT, at the very least that is the intent". If it were the intent, why did SE's staff decide to expend great effort (hiring counsel, etc) on overriding such a core part of the license as the notice preservation requirement? Seriously, if they intended to go with the OSI MIT License, nothing was stopping them just doing so. | |
| Jan 14, 2016 at 19:25 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | @sampablokuper I'm not a lawyer, I suspect you're wrong, but I can't be sure. So I'll just contine assuming the chosen license is MIT, at the very least that is the intent | |
| Jan 14, 2016 at 19:24 | comment | added | user136089 | "I can understand why the MIT license was chosen.". Ahem. The 'MIT License' was not chosen. | |
| Jan 14, 2016 at 18:39 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2016 at 18:06 | history | answered | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |