Timeline for Change rep required to downvote on MSE
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 17:11 | comment | added | nicael | @Werner I mean, it doesn't seem to be linked from anywhere. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 18:27 | history | bounty ended | Pollyanna | ||
| Feb 18, 2016 at 20:37 | comment | added | Werner | @nicael: Pro users? | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 21:45 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | ahh I see it: i.sstatic.net/95V4x.png Thanks!! :D | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 21:39 | comment | added | nicael | @ᔕᖺᘎᕊ There's a link for pro users ;) | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 21:38 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | How do you get the anonymous user feedback count?! | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 21:06 | comment | added | Erik | It is better in the sense that they can feel like they're being heard to a degree and see that others are or aren't expressing a similar view. Of course it going to be skewed because people will now get 1 normal vote plus n anonymous/sock puppet votes.... Overall I still think that answers and up-voting answers you agree with is more informative and more helpful than blind down-votes. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:56 | comment | added | nicael | @Erik Why is it better? Why do the users with association bonus have less right to express the disagreement via real downvotes and this way we have the votes separated? | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:52 | comment | added | Erik | I think showing the anonymous/low rep votes to all users would be more helpful on Meta.SE than elsewhere, especially for controversial/high profile posts. I also think that is a better solution to the "disenfranchisement" problem than lower the requirements for down-votes. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:12 | comment | added | user213963 | The current anon score that you show is probably correct (and too fresh for the database dump to have picked it up). The first proposal one is probably also correct (that +7k kind of surprised me - but I do recall how widely circulated the post was on HN and /r/programming and the like - the "yea, something needs to be done vote."). | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:11 | comment | added | nicael | @Michael Hm, then those numbers are definitely only recent and dunno how to fix. Still, I think the feedback for the newer post is probably correct. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:09 | comment | added | user213963 | If I happen to have this query I recall that I wrote... data.stackexchange.com/meta.stackexchange/query/220020/… (and if that query is correct), then the anon score was +7134/-638. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:06 | comment | added | nicael | @Michael 126/-20 - I've mentioned it. Though those are quite low numbers (not to say about the numbers of downvotes, but about both), so I think it could be erased or just be shown for a certain period (selecting day/month/all doesn't fix it and it has "day" selected by default, so probably something doesn't work). | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 20:04 | comment | added | user213963 | Just curious what the anon-feedback on the original post was. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 19:27 | comment | added | nicael | While was typing the answer, another downvote and ten anon/low-rep downvotes. | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 19:24 | history | answered | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
