Timeline for New badge suggestion for high negative score [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2023 at 3:15 | comment | added | mathlander | If this question was [status-approved], you would get a badge for it. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 18:18 | comment | added | M.A.R. | Here, have a badge. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 17:59 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 1, 2016 at 17:26 | comment | added | goldilocks | How about a special all-season "dunce hat" mandatorily placed on your avatar for a week? | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:24 | comment | added | Greg | @sandoval31 you definitely earn it. I up vote for that. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:23 | comment | added | sandoval31 | @Greg At least I could deserve a badge for a funny question... | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:21 | comment | added | Greg | Hahaha. U made my laugh dude due to the question score and due to the question topic. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:13 | vote | accept | sandoval31 | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:02 | comment | added | sandoval31 | @Rory Alsop Yes, obviously, in the stack Exchange world, laws are retroactive! :-) | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:56 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | Ahh - I see what you tried to do here sandoval31 :-) | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | user213963 | Badges are to encourage good behavior. Getting something heavily down voted is only very very rarely something that comes out of good behavior. We shouldn't be encouraging people to write crap (the 99% case) (or fail to do the proper research to see if the question already exists) to get another badge. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:44 | history | closed | Shadow Wizard feature-request Users with the feature-request badge or a synonym can single-handedly close feature-request questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. | Duplicate of Badge suggestion: Zealot (got 3 questions with at least 10 downvotes each) | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:42 | answer | added | JonW | timeline score: 17 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:40 | history | asked | sandoval31 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |