Skip to main content
39 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 28, 2017 at 5:34 history suggested John Militer CC BY-SA 3.0
Added clarity and accuracy to the title
Jun 28, 2017 at 3:16 review Suggested edits
S Jun 28, 2017 at 5:34
Jul 12, 2016 at 1:05 review Suggested edits
Jul 12, 2016 at 2:01
Jun 8, 2016 at 3:38 history edited Quill CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
S May 8, 2016 at 20:35 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S May 8, 2016 at 20:35 history notice removed CommunityBot
May 6, 2016 at 21:37 review Suggested edits
May 6, 2016 at 22:21
May 6, 2016 at 6:46 answer added Mark Hurd timeline score: 8
May 6, 2016 at 6:10 answer added Nick Volynkin timeline score: 0
S May 6, 2016 at 3:34 history suggested John Militer CC BY-SA 3.0
slightly improved grammer
May 6, 2016 at 2:36 review Suggested edits
S May 6, 2016 at 3:34
May 5, 2016 at 23:35 answer added John Militer timeline score: 19
May 5, 2016 at 23:09 comment added AAM111 @John, can you rewrite that as a full answer? This seems (and 26 people agree with me at time of writing) to be a good solution.
S Apr 30, 2016 at 19:28 history bounty started gnat
S Apr 30, 2016 at 19:28 history notice added gnat Draw attention
Apr 29, 2016 at 1:57 comment added John Militer @sho9 I think what they should do make it so that whenever a post is closed for being off-topic and the owner has less than 50 reputation, the accepted answer is automatically unaccepted and the user cannot reaccept it. Basically, what I mean is making "accepting answers to closed questions that are closed for being off-topic" a privilege awarded at 50 or so reputation.
Apr 28, 2016 at 21:36 comment added gnat @Gilles at Stack Overflow triage does this kind of magic
Apr 28, 2016 at 21:08 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' @Shog9 I wish there was something magical, hitting delete a couple dozen times is boring.
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:39 comment added Shog9 Mod Not sure there's anything magical about hitting delete a couple dozen times, but... Done, @gnat.
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:25 comment added gnat related: Sudden increase in off-topic posts on MSE - example showing that attacks of certain scale simply can't be adequately handled by community moderation at smaller sites
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:19 comment added Brad Larson @AlonEitan - Sorry, my amused tone may not have been conveyed there. Those users are part of this group, and the answers appear to be largely plagiarized (thus the second link in my comment). Same self-answering and rampant plagiarism as the rest, and they're all coming from the same university. What a mess.
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:17 history edited gnat
edited tags
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:14 comment added Alon Eitan @BradLarson Oh, I just thought that I identified another pattern because both uses ask questions and answered to each other, and got downvotes for both their questions and answers. Sorry
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:07 comment added Brad Larson @AlonEitan - Nothing at all suspicious about this answer: cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/34564/38606 cough: researchgate.net/post/…
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:06 comment added user1228 @Kaveh holy hell.
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:04 comment added gnat @Shog9 all the TCS moderators appear AFK now (last seen: 5h ago, 2 days ago, Apr 21). And their front page is totally polluted with garbage. Can you please please please use your dev access magic and simply remove mess from there
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:03 comment added Alon Eitan Thanks @BradLarson, also these two are answering each other questions with a lot of downvotes
Apr 28, 2016 at 20:00 comment added Brad Larson @AlonEitan - Pretty sure that was yet another account of a different troll. I've taken care of their accounts.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:38 comment added Kaveh Thanks @Gilles. I will do as you suggest and will flag them as low quality.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:37 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Please downvote and flag. The downvotes help with the automatic post blocks, and we'll delete all the plagiarized or extremely low quality content on sight.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:33 comment added Alon Eitan @Shog9 LOL thanks, because it was about kitten names and JS arrays (If i remember correctly) so I thought is was related
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:31 comment added Shog9 Mod Not that I'm aware of, @Alon. India does not possess a monopoly on bad questions.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:30 comment added Kaveh @Won't, I do that and also vote to delete, but I can vote to delete only after a few days I think, and even then since there is no delete review queue other users who can vote to delete do not see them, so it is really left to moderators to clean up these. If it was a just a few it wouldn't be a problem but 30 questions in an hour is too much to handle manually I think.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:30 comment added Alon Eitan @Shog9 I'm just curious - Was this question is one of those idiots?
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:28 comment added user1228 I always downvote all the things and VTC. Sometime after closed and negative-scored, you can vote to delete.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:23 comment added Shog9 Mod I temporarily blocked new-user questions from a bunch of vodafone IPs, which should slow this down a bit also.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:18 comment added Brad Larson If you're seeing this on CS or CS Theory, I believe those sites have been subject to a coordinated attack by students from an Indian university. They have been posting terrible questions that are immediately answered by other students (usually using plagiarized content) and then they are voting in a tight ring, inflating posts by 8 or more votes. They just tried to pull this on Stack Overflow, and they'll find they no longer have accounts there. New accounts from that university should now be blocked from posting for a while. I've informed the other moderators.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:18 history edited Kaveh CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:04 history asked Kaveh CC BY-SA 3.0