Timeline for Is there a system in place to prevent new users asking, answering and accepting answers to each others' off-topic questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 25, 2017 at 2:24 | history | edited | John Militer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
Jun 15, 2017 at 0:01 | history | edited | John Militer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Jul 6, 2016 at 0:03 | history | edited | John Militer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Jun 12, 2016 at 22:56 | comment | added | John Militer | @Dan Bron Yes, it should also apply to upvotes. :) | |
Jun 12, 2016 at 22:45 | comment | added | Dan Bron | Not just the accept vote, but also OP's upvotes on any answers (so closed, off-topic questions can be deleted more easily; effectively "unasked"). In parallel, for similar reasons, a priv at 50 (or whatever threshold) to "upvote questions of 1-rep users". On EL&U, we get a large population of ESL students, effectively as silent lurkers who upvote off-topic questions from 1-rep users (i.e. newbies unaware of ELL.se), as well as any (still off-topic) answers they attract. Which attracts even more of the same. Quite frustrating. | |
Jun 12, 2016 at 22:12 | history | edited | John Militer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body
|
Jun 2, 2016 at 0:29 | comment | added | John Militer | @arjafi I used to think it should only apply to questions closed for being off-topic, but I no longer think that. | |
May 8, 2016 at 20:35 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
May 6, 2016 at 3:58 | comment | added | user642796 | Why make this restriction only for "off-topic" and not "primarily opinion-based", "too broad" and "unclear"? | |
May 5, 2016 at 23:35 | history | answered | John Militer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |