Timeline for A proposed philosophy of question migration
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 13, 2016 at 23:22 | comment | added | gnat | when source site like Stack Overflow is 200x larger than target site like Programmers (8K questions a day vs 40), no spreading can help | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 23:20 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @gnat You are correct. I've never had any experience with that. Perhaps use the edit review queue, so the burden is spread among many people? | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 23:05 | comment | added | gnat | that sorta indicates that you don't know how it feels like when site regulars are overwhelmed with rejecting hordes of senseless migrations, instead of enjoying on-topic questions and answers | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 22:51 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | @gnat That's the purpose of the target site either accepting or rejecting. | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 22:28 | comment | added | gnat | downvoters possibly don't want that VtCers like this one have any power to migrate to Programmers. And that guy isn't just a single case, see eg Please stop using Programmers.SE as your toilet bowl and New SE Chat Bot feature for identifying when Programmers is mentioned on Stack Overflow | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 21:34 | comment | added | Dessa Simpson | Could the downvoters please explain your position? | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 21:27 | history | answered | Dessa Simpson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |