Timeline for How to handle repeat voting fraudster who re-serial-votes after every reversal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:35 | history | edited | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
mods have tools; sometimes you can only flag your own account
|
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:30 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | @S.L.Barth Mods can see all these details by looking at the account though, so just pointing to the user and indicating that you suspect repeated and sneaky serial downvoting is all they need. On top of that, mods have access to tools to confirm suspected targeted voting that make the circumstantial evidence unnecessary to provide. | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:29 | history | edited | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
mods have tools
|
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:25 | comment | added | S.L. Barth is on codidact.com | Custom mod flag seems the way to go. But there is a large amount of circumstantial evidence here that wouldn't fit in a single custom mod flag. Maybe the "Contact us" link? | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:22 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | @AlexanderO'Mara D'oh, there's what I get for assuming. I have edited the answer to cover both mod and non-mod readers. :) | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:22 | history | edited | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 420 characters in body
|
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:19 | comment | added | Alexander O'Mara | "You can give them a short time-out" Maybe if I was a moderator. :) | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 19:19 | history | answered | SevenSidedDie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |