Timeline for How to handle repeat voting fraudster who re-serial-votes after every reversal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 12, 2017 at 15:22 | comment | added | gnat | understood, thank you. While I have your attention, do you expect something like "wave of vote reversals" when it goes to production? (this can probably be predicted by some "dry run" of the system or by trying it at some smaller site first) If yes you'd better make some sort of meta announcement to serve as dupe target for "wave of complaints" that may possibly follow :) | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 15:15 | comment | added | user50049 | @gnat Not yet, but close. What you noticed is probably an artifact of someone having to go in and deal with a ring manually. When the new system goes in place (and the breadth of the revised queries go into effect), that won't happen anymore. We'll catch it much sooner so folks don't see a manual reversal of a ton of votes that the system didn't catch in time. | |
| Jan 12, 2017 at 7:25 | comment | added | gnat | Tim I've got a feeling that new anti-fraud system is rolled out, is that correct? The reason why I think so is I've got a bunch of really ancient revenge votes reversed today, I remember complaining about these more than half year ago (IIRC back then it was confirmed as fraudulent and I was given a promise that new system will revert) | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 17:12 | comment | added | user50049 | Looks like we might have a couple of users coordinating here, going to dig deeper into this. Gimme a day or two and you'll see the votes removed. | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 16:12 | comment | added | Alexander O'Mara | Glad to hear the reversal system is getting an upgrade. It seems bad actors have learned how to avoid it. | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 16:09 | comment | added | Alexander O'Mara | It was on that site most wouldn't touch with a 10ft pole, Politics Beta. Thanks for taking a look! | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 15:19 | history | answered | user50049 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |