Timeline for display tag is too ambiguous, better be burninated
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 at 19:17 | vote | accept | Shadow Wizard | ||
| Sep 22, 2017 at 14:30 | answer | added | ale | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 15:52 | comment | added | rene Mod | @ShadowWizard tag wiki edited | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 15:47 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @rene not sure, will take a look on the remaining questions soon. Maybe worth to edit the display tag wiki to explain it's better not be used? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 15:37 | comment | added | rene Mod | I edited those posts that were not closed. So what is left is only closed posts but I hold back on editing those to not put things in the re-open queue without a need. Maybe wait for an SE employee to remove the tag? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 11:32 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @rene why not? "is used for questions relating to how information is displayed to Stack Exchange users" - looks perfect fit for questions like this one here. No? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 10:31 | comment | added | rene Mod | information-display? Srsly? | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 16:57 | history | asked | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |