Timeline for Can we implement temporary automatic comment ban on 'x' number of validated rude comment flags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2018 at 14:46 | comment | added | Cascabel | Annotations aren't necessarily seen. To get mods to validate, whether it's "this was unjustified" or "this should've been more severe", we need autoflags or similar. And if we're going to validate anyway, seems nice to validate before the ban. I think we all agree there should be more consequences for rude comments, no one is questioning that. This is just about exactly what consequences to implement and how. | |
| Apr 23, 2018 at 8:04 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | er ^ pretty much those things - other than that "We don't have a lot of control over that". I'm an optimist and I figure we can at least win a few over ;p | |
| Apr 23, 2018 at 5:50 | comment | added | user310756 | As with any bad behaviour - the automatic suspensions could be annotated into the user's history, if the person keeps offending, then account suspensions can be implemented. Currently there's next to no consequences for rude comments - unless it's a blown up fight - which has allowed users to be rude over and over under other people's posts without pause. A comment suspension provides a pause. AS to whether people learn from suspensions, that's up to each individual and we don't have a lot of control over that. | |
| Apr 23, 2018 at 5:45 | history | answered | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |