Timeline for We'd like your feedback on our new Code of Conduct!
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2018 at 22:29 | comment | added | Cool Fool | @nvoigt Of course it's off-topic! Otherwise non-Christians wouldn't be able to use Christianity.SE, etc. | |
| Jul 17, 2018 at 15:07 | comment | added | nvoigt | I'm afraid "religion, gender, race etc" is not off-.topic on SE in general. Just browse IPS.SE for example. And I guess Christianity.SE would be empty, too. I know it feels that way when you use the programming related sites, but the focus has shifted slightly. | |
| Jul 10, 2018 at 21:10 | comment | added | Cool Fool | @GentlePurpleRain What I meant is that they're not there to solve problems, but to have fun. A riddle is mentally stimulating but won't prevent you from achieving anything except solving the riddle. | |
| Jul 10, 2018 at 18:21 | comment | added | GentlePurpleRain | For the record, users on Puzzling.SE do commonly collaborate to provide a high-quality answer to a question. | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 14:24 | comment | added | Tezra | Minor detail, but in the case of Sock Puppets, mods will take action against you personally (to the extent of banning all of your accounts) | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 9:16 | comment | added | Mark Amery | I kind of like the idea, aesthetically, of framing Stack Overflow's process as one in which an asker and answerers collaboratively create a resource of use to future readers. I'm not sure whether that framing makes much difference to anything in the CoC, though. As for your four levels of moderation action, they're actually all already in the CoC; it's just that only 1, 3, and 4 appear in the examples, and only 2, 3 and 4 appear in the diagram above the examples - a weird inconsistency that others have commented on already. | |
| Jul 9, 2018 at 6:53 | history | answered | Cool Fool | CC BY-SA 4.0 |