Timeline for An apology to our community, and next steps
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 7, 2019 at 22:13 | comment | added | einpoklum | @fredsbend: Would appreciate your thoughts on my own reply. | |
Oct 7, 2019 at 21:06 | comment | added | einpoklum | @fredsbend: But they considered firing her on what is apparently false cause. And got outed about it. And still double down on the termination. | |
Oct 7, 2019 at 7:00 | comment | added | user212646 | @LаngLаngС Why not immediately? Because they apparently did already consider firing her, now they agree to review that decision. That puts Monica somewhere in the process. More thoughts on this. | |
Oct 7, 2019 at 6:55 | comment | added | LаngLаngС | Think you misread: "unless both agree" only refers to future actions? / Moreover: Firing was 'shipping' a mod-removal. Violating the existing processes and expectations, and now admitted as 'mistakes'. Fine. In a working version-control system, one rolls back (posts on SE have that very feature). As firing was a fruit of the forbidden tree: why not reinstate M 'immediately?' That's what I wonder about. I only see that SE sees that as waste of time, as they still want "to stand by that decision"? | |
Oct 7, 2019 at 5:51 | history | answered | user212646 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |