Timeline for Do you think it's right to stymie opinions on important topics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019 at 14:07 | history | edited | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reference
|
| Oct 17, 2019 at 14:06 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @LangLangC don't feel bad; I only learned this myself yesterday :) | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 13:38 | comment | added | LаngLаngС | Oh wow, learned something. It wasn't clear to me that the protection was automatic. It looked like some kind of edit war to me. This tidbit you gave away here was important info! | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 12:31 | history | edited | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 217 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2019 at 12:28 | comment | added | Sir Cornflakes | To my big surprise, answer #137 (not counting the invisible ones) indeed added something substantial and new to the question: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/334900/… | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 12:28 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @soxroxr If you have nothing new then it is not useful to duplicate existing answers; you're supposed to upvote those that you agree with. If, however, you have an answer that nobody else has written yet, then that is something new, and so fire away. | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 12:27 | comment | added | soxroxr | You don't have to add something new to add something useful. If a company receives one complaint, do you think that one opinion is enough to change anything? Numbers of shared opinions and perspectives are important. I read through all of the answers and I didn't see one that ideally supported my viewpoint. I saw many that said things I agreed with and I upvoted them, but my personal point of view wasn't really covered. | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 12:21 | history | answered | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |