Timeline for Can the official FAQ be changed slightly with respect to editing old posts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2021 at 14:10 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
(While we are at it.) - yes, I did not bump it (that was by an answer edit!) [<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/from#Preposition> <http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)].
|
| Oct 21, 2019 at 15:12 | comment | added | Frédéric Hamidi | @jknappen, powers that be, sorry, I've seen this used here often enough that I believed it was common knowledge. | |
| Oct 21, 2019 at 15:08 | comment | added | Sir Cornflakes | @FrédéricHamidi: What do you mean by PTB?—BTW, the edit clarifies a lot, I thought Kromster argued in favour of editing the stock of old Q&A to conform the new standard on pronoun usage. | |
| Oct 21, 2019 at 14:31 | comment | added | Frédéric Hamidi | @jknappen, just correcting pronouns is not substantial. I challenge you to run this view point by the current PTB at SE and see how well it fares. You may be surprised. There is already a precedent, as we can still remove salutations and thanks from posts but are forbidden to touch pronoun announcements there. | |
| Oct 21, 2019 at 14:21 | history | edited | Kromster | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 325 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2019 at 14:11 | comment | added | Sir Cornflakes | Mass editing poisons the "active questions" list and is bad for that reason. Remember that an edit should be substantial, just correcting pronouns is not substantial. | |
| Oct 21, 2019 at 12:07 | history | answered | Kromster | CC BY-SA 4.0 |