Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 10, 2020 at 7:39 history bounty ended gnat
Oct 22, 2019 at 18:08 comment added Sklivvz I agree with @RobertHarvey, from what I read, it seems the removal was an abuse. Kick one popular and vocal mod who stands up to you to tame the others. I don't have any evidence, but given some of the other public behaviors, I am convinced that this MO is within the realm of possibility.
Oct 22, 2019 at 15:01 comment added Monica Cellio I also haven't been told anything about why it "had" to be done when it was done. I've heard assertions of urgency but cannot correlate them with any of my activity.
Oct 22, 2019 at 14:26 comment added user102937 "This isn't an emergency removal..." If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... Actually, I don't think it was an emergency removal either. I think it was an action taken by a single person who didn't like the conversation they were in. Call it what you will, but it's the very antithesis of community.
Oct 22, 2019 at 7:36 comment added Resistance Is Futile Absolutely. And before that they have to clear her name in the press. Whether or not they remove her afterwards, going to the press was huge mistake that must be rectified.
Oct 22, 2019 at 7:01 comment added Magisch @Ziv That's essentially what I'm saying. Part of following due process is discounting and nulling any action that was out of process. Start from the last uncontroversial point of reference, e.g prior to her removal, and go from there. This backwards system they proposed now is wholly insufficient
Oct 22, 2019 at 7:00 comment added Ziv I basically agree with you. This removal is a colossal botch. But I do feel that having a process and respecting it is possibly a reasonable way out of that botch, that SE can live with.
Oct 22, 2019 at 6:56 history answered Magisch CC BY-SA 4.0