Timeline for Is the Community capable of coming up with better solutions than "the Loop"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2019 at 8:19 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading. [<http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)].
|
| Nov 26, 2019 at 18:39 | comment | added | Scott Seidman | The snark might be limited by enforcing brainstorming rules on comments. | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 18:37 | comment | added | Scott Seidman | @ab2ReinstateMonicaNow -- fleshing this out, there is a subtle difference between the way we style sites now. The number of questions would be limited, and the answers hopefully manifest. Would a proposal for a site focussed on Discussion and not Q/A be off the table for an Area51 site? | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 18:33 | comment | added | user540056 | This has promise. It would have to be self-moderated, and/or have moderators elected by the users. Snark, no matter how witty and to the point, would have to be promptly deleted. (And I love snark.) If we started with an Area 51 proposal, it would have to be clearly differentiated from Meta and from The Workplace. And its supporters should regard it as a pre-pilot program to establish proof of principle, not as their cherished baby. | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 16:38 | comment | added | Scott Seidman | @dustytrash edited. Does that address your question? | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 16:38 | history | edited | Scott Seidman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 269 characters in body
|
| Nov 26, 2019 at 16:36 | comment | added | dustytrash | Could you clarify what a 'stack' and a 'work group' are? I was going to post a overly simplified answer but I'm thinking it might be a duplicate of this answer | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 15:56 | history | answered | Scott Seidman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |