Timeline for How can we appreciate and encourage voters?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 29, 2019 at 1:54 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | The vote caps are for our protection (so we don't get too addicted). | |
Nov 27, 2019 at 14:02 | comment | added | Rebecca J. Stones | I believe voting encourages voting. On the small sites, if a small number (maybe even just 5) of dedicated users systematically go through and upvote worthwhile posts, then it'll raise the "bar" [a score of 0 or +1 among a bunch of +5s sends a louder message than a score of -1 among a bunch of 0s]. (It's something I did at Islam.SE and am currently doing at Chinese.SE. It just takes longer with the cap.) | |
Nov 27, 2019 at 12:53 | comment | added | 0scar | @RebeccaJ.Stones On small sites you rarely run into the caps. And how does lifting the caps get people to vote? If they aren't voting at all (or rarely), lifting the caps will not give them that extra push. Lifting the caps will only appreciate the current voters. | |
Nov 27, 2019 at 12:02 | comment | added | Rebecca J. Stones | I note there is precedent for loosening the vote cap: Vote For This Question or The Kitten Gets It: The daily vote limit used to be 30 votes per day; we’ve increased that to a maximum of 40 votes per day — but only if you vote on a combination of answers and questions. | |
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:42 | comment | added | Rebecca J. Stones | It’s probably not a bad idea provided it’s restricted to “trusted users”, perhaps those with sufficient reputation. I don’t see a risk to letting such users (those who have experience with the site) have more votes. | |
Nov 27, 2019 at 4:20 | history | answered | Stop Harming the Community | CC BY-SA 4.0 |