Timeline for Multi-Line Comment With Code Does Not Properly Markup Unless You Edit and Save Again
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 21, 2014 at 16:27 | comment | added | BartoszKP | @badp I know. I mentioned that just be because it is a thing that comes to mind as a counter-argument to my argument above. If you agree, then this part is irrelevant. | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 16:15 | comment | added | badp | @BartoszKP Abusive comments like that are likely going to be flagged to oblivion on normal questions. The whole point of that question is to stretch the system as far as possible. | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 15:21 | comment | added | BartoszKP | @badp Comments can't be "arbitrarily tall", because of character count limit (they can be quite tall anyway: see here). In general concept of comment folding does help in this case - it should be dependent on comments height, not comment count (still following your "site structure" requirement, which frankly speaking I find strange anyway). Abusive cases are anyway possible using Zalgo text for example (again refer to this thread). | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 15:14 | comment | added | badp | @BartoszKP No; that doesn't help if every comment is arbitrarily tall. | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 14:02 | comment | added | BartoszKP | @badp So, if that was the only problem (as opposed the unfolded comments), doesn't that answer your requirement about the "impact on the overall structure"? | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 13:59 | comment | added | badp | @BartoszKP The site does limit the comment count on a per-page basis by not showing them by default. | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 13:38 | comment | added | BartoszKP | @badp Isn't space determined by the character count limit? I understand that you favour vertical space implicitly when you speak about site structure. But if you do, then the comment count should be limited too. This doesn't make sense - comments should deleted afterwards anyway, so why not make them convenient? | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 13:34 | comment | added | badp | @BartoszKP It means you're getting less space on the page. The impact of comments on the overall structure of the site is limited. | |
Jan 21, 2014 at 13:27 | comment | added | BartoszKP | @badp Since when being less important implies not having new lines? | |
Oct 18, 2010 at 6:23 | comment | added | Michael Mrozek | It seems like shift+enter should just not work at all | |
Oct 18, 2010 at 6:01 | comment | added | badp | @Mohammad to keep comments comments -- they're less important than answers. | |
Oct 18, 2010 at 5:44 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 170 characters in body
|
Oct 17, 2010 at 15:07 | comment | added | Saw | Why to prevent them, please give me an convincing answer, thanks. | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 3:51 | vote | accept | Engineer2021 | ||
Dec 31, 2009 at 0:24 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |