Timeline for Time for a major shift in strategy and approach
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2021 at 9:41 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 9, 2020 at 20:40 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 109 characters in body
|
| Jan 17, 2020 at 6:04 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quora> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet>].
|
| Jan 16, 2020 at 14:51 | comment | added | GhostCat | Obviously I meant ... in order to not repeat what happened here ... | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 14:27 | comment | added | GhostCat | @Trilarion And for those, who intend to establish viable alternatives, like codidact.com ... in order to repeat what happened here, the biggest problem is to invent a setup, right from the start, that results in a solid framework that defines the relationship between the content providers and the content hosters that gives both sides some sort of autonomy. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 14:22 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | The relation between a community and a company providing services around the community is probably really the key here. The company seems to think of users more like of a resource and the users seem to kind of expect a relation at equal eye level. What is actually possible and what is adequate and what went wrong? Maybe a question for philosophers, politicians or historians. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 14:17 | history | edited | GhostCat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 117 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2020 at 14:10 | history | answered | GhostCat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |