Timeline for The company’s commitment to rebuilding the relationship with you, our community
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2020 at 14:54 | comment | added | Piskvor left the building | "recognize that you didn't get a proper process (which they did already)" - nope. All that SE published is, in essence "the process has finished, we regret that you don't like the outcome" - nothing else. | |
| Feb 25, 2020 at 9:00 | comment | added | Glen_b | @TRiG As has been stated by the company here in meta, it didn't prevent them offering her the chance to "apply" for reinstatement, but since the process for reinstatement is entirely their own, surely they can choose not to force her to be subject to it? If they revised that process and it said "if you didn't get a proper process in order to be removed, as soon as we recognize it (which they did already), the reinstatement process is automatic, if you still want it" | |
| Feb 24, 2020 at 23:18 | comment | added | mxyzplk | It is very unlikely that the agreement prevents them from doing more, for example bypassing reinstatement process and just directly offering reinstatement. As I mentioned in my answer already. | |
| Feb 24, 2020 at 20:31 | comment | added | TRiG | There's now a legal agreement with Monica, so this might well be impossible. | |
| Feb 24, 2020 at 18:28 | history | edited | mxyzplk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 999 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2020 at 13:25 | history | edited | mxyzplk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 124 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2020 at 3:37 | history | edited | mxyzplk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 369 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2020 at 3:31 | history | answered | mxyzplk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |