Timeline for Should I flag answers consisting only of "No" or "Yes"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2020 at 16:35 | comment | added | AlexP | We can be certain that we are approaching peak sensitivity when one can argue with a straight face that the single word "yes" is most usually abusive. | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 9:33 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | Apparently assume good intentions is no longer policy. I might have been confused on that point. But calling an answer rude or abusive simply because it is one word is certainly a personal attack on the answerer. I don't care if you only do it some of the time. | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 9:27 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft | @AnonymousPhysicist: The last paragraph addresses the cases, where good intentions can indeed be assumed. Apart from such cases, I do not think that somebody posts such answers with good intentions. And even if, we also delete rude content if posted with good intentions (though usually, we can edit that; which doesn’t apply here). | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 9:02 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | I don't think we should support this position because it violates the "assume good intentions" policy. | |
| Mar 25, 2020 at 8:47 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 184 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2020 at 21:32 | history | answered | Wrzlprmft | CC BY-SA 4.0 |