Timeline for Is there an etiquette for asking questions originally intended to be self-answered?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 9:17 | comment | added | starball | I found other posts that seems to have strong relevancy: Is a short description of a question OK if self-answering?, and Self answer and research effort [duplicate] (closed as a dup of the previous one). Do you think either of those answers this question? | |
| Jan 2, 2023 at 13:56 | history | edited | tripleee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
English fixes
|
| Jan 2, 2023 at 7:20 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
inline comment
|
| Jan 2, 2023 at 7:18 | comment | added | starball | "Does the question should be closed even all the effort made by the OP on writing the detailed answer?" Can you clarify- did you mean one of the following? 1) "Should the question be closed despite the effort that went into writing the detailed answer?" or 2) "Should the question be closed if the research effort is only shown in the answer and not in the question?"? I have the same question as 2, but I'm not sure which one you meant if you meant either of those. Or did you mean something else? | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 4:39 | answer | added | PolyGeo | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 3:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 9, 2020 at 4:32 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2020 at 3:35 | history | edited | Rubén | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 9, 2020 at 2:58 | history | asked | Rubén | CC BY-SA 4.0 |