Timeline for Please revert the line-height change!
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2020 at 18:43 | comment | added | ChrisW |
@AndrewLeach On that page he line-height for body is 1.5, but for p and td it's 1.4.
|
|
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:54 | comment | added | Tinkeringbell Mod | w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/text-spacing.html > There's something there under 'related resources' that links to an entire, whole, study? Maybe that's where they got the figures from? | |
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:54 | comment | added | Sebastian Simon | The line-height was originally exactly 1.3, if I’m interpreting the CSS rules correctly. | |
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:49 | comment | added | MaxD | Also interesting to see how they themselves are at the very bottom of their own range instead of somewhere in the middle like you'd expect. Maaaaybe because line-heights that big aren't actually that good. | |
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:39 | comment | added | Andrew Leach |
@MaxD Yes, that page is set for line-height: 1.5; which is within their own guidelines. I think I'd like to see how the W3C came up with those figures though. It's quite likely that the range they suggest is down to font considerations such as I give here.
|
|
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:36 | comment | added | MaxD | Ironic that even the webpage where they got the 1.6 from is perfectly readable, just our dear SE obviously has to be different... w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/C21.html | |
| Aug 27, 2020 at 16:23 | history | answered | Andrew Leach | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
