Skip to main content
added 17 characters in body
Source Link
stevec
  • 1.3k
  • 6
  • 13

The amount of rep spent on bounties should not affect a user's ability to answer a question, since bounties are themselves a sign of useful participation.

If anything, a history of placing bounties should have no bearing or(or even a slightly positive bearing) on whether a user ought to be able to answer a question.

Solution

Allow the 10>=10 rep check to be performed on gross rep, not netnet rep. Keep a column of gross rep in the database, and only change it when a user places a bounty (so gross rep will always be a users rep + any rep spent on bounties)

Example

User getwith an association bonus, getgets 10 upvotes on an answer for a total of 201 rep, then places a 200 rep bounty. Their rep is 1, but their gross rep is 101, well aboutabove the 10 rep threshold for answering a highly active question.

Is it worth it?

The only remaining question is the effort worth it to cater to a relative small number of potential answerers. That's a question I can't answer.

The amount of rep spent on bounties should not affect a user's ability to answer a question, since bounties are themselves a sign of useful participation.

If anything, a history of placing bounties should have no bearing or even a slightly positive bearing on whether a user ought to be able to answer a question.

Solution

Allow the 10 rep to be performed on gross rep, not net rep. Keep a column of gross rep in the database, and only change it when a user places a bounty (so gross rep will always be a users rep + any rep spent on bounties)

Example

User get association bonus, get 10 upvotes on an answer for a total of 201 rep, then places a 200 rep bounty. Their rep is 1, but their gross rep is 101, well about the 10 rep threshold for answering a highly active question.

Is it worth it?

The only remaining question is the effort worth it to cater to a relative small number of potential answerers. That's a question I can't answer.

The amount of rep spent on bounties should not affect a user's ability to answer a question, since bounties are themselves a sign of useful participation.

If anything, a history of placing bounties should have no bearing (or even a slightly positive bearing) on whether a user ought to be able to answer a question.

Solution

Allow the >=10 rep check to be performed on gross rep, not net rep. Keep a column of gross rep in the database, and only change it when a user places a bounty (so gross rep will always be a users rep + any rep spent on bounties)

Example

User with an association bonus, gets 10 upvotes on an answer for a total of 201 rep, then places a 200 rep bounty. Their rep is 1, but their gross rep is 101, well above the 10 rep threshold for answering a highly active question.

Is it worth it?

The only remaining question is the effort worth it to cater to a relative small number of potential answerers. That's a question I can't answer.

Source Link
stevec
  • 1.3k
  • 6
  • 13

The amount of rep spent on bounties should not affect a user's ability to answer a question, since bounties are themselves a sign of useful participation.

If anything, a history of placing bounties should have no bearing or even a slightly positive bearing on whether a user ought to be able to answer a question.

Solution

Allow the 10 rep to be performed on gross rep, not net rep. Keep a column of gross rep in the database, and only change it when a user places a bounty (so gross rep will always be a users rep + any rep spent on bounties)

Example

User get association bonus, get 10 upvotes on an answer for a total of 201 rep, then places a 200 rep bounty. Their rep is 1, but their gross rep is 101, well about the 10 rep threshold for answering a highly active question.

Is it worth it?

The only remaining question is the effort worth it to cater to a relative small number of potential answerers. That's a question I can't answer.