Timeline for The future of Community Promotion, Open Source, and Hot Network Questions Ads
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2021 at 11:43 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | You make a good point about the re-sampling of the existing catalogue, @E.P. — I checked with the Ads team, and we'd be willing to allow for the higher density ads as usual for the trial, even if at the risk of incurring in some errors :) We can always adjust later, if needed. | |
| May 19, 2021 at 13:28 | comment | added | user1271772 | Thanks for the edit @JNat, I'm an alpha tester of the new Markdown/rich-text Stacks editor and while this answer seemed to turn out properly yesterday when I drafted the answer, something seems to have messed up afterwards (i.e. extra `\` escape characters) which you fixed just now. | |
| May 19, 2021 at 13:25 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| May 19, 2021 at 11:32 | comment | added | E.P. | @JNat If the 600x500 doubled-for-Retina format gets ruled out it will feel rather antagonistic for no good reason. As mentioned in this answer, we have a large catalog in the large format. It would be very nice to be able to reuse it without being forced to re-sample multiple ads, particularly if there is no strong reason for forcing the change. | |
| May 19, 2021 at 9:28 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | That's a good point. Technically this would be possible, but it would add a layer of complexity to the process of setting these ads up. So for the purposes of the trial we've decided to only allow 300x250 and 728x90 banners. We'll see how this goes after that, and will consider including this possibility at the first evaluation of this project. | |
| May 18, 2021 at 16:51 | history | answered | user1271772 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |