Timeline for Reverse engineering clause in Careers terms of service?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 17:48 | history | edited | mmyersMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
tiny edit mainly so I can re-upvote (I accidentally removed my vote after the last edit)
|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 17:45 | answer | added | Pollyanna | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 25, 2010 at 17:40 | history | edited | perbert |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 25, 2010 at 17:23 | history | edited | Brian Campbell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 989 characters in body
|
| Jan 22, 2010 at 19:12 | history | edited | Brian Campbell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jan 22, 2010 at 18:30 | comment | added | Brian Campbell | @John Heh, yeah, that came out a little longer than I intended. I started reading the agreement, found the clause about reverse engineering, and began writing a response. Then as I read more of the agreement, I kept on finding more things to add that bothered me. As long as my response is, it's an eighth the length of the agreement itself. | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 18:12 | comment | added | Paul Nathan | +1 because I'd like to see a Joel/Jeff answer, not because I have a stance here(I don't). | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 18:04 | answer | added | Andreas Bonini | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 18:02 | answer | added | squillman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 17:54 | comment | added | Ladybug Killer | Speaking about intimidating long... | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 17:53 | comment | added | Brian Campbell | Right, I normally wouldn't either, but the "or otherwise reduce to human readable form" seems to describe de-minifying exactly. | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 17:50 | comment | added | Shog9 | Good catch... I normally wouldn't even consider de-minifying JS code to be equivalent to decompiling, and that restriction makes no sense otherwise in the context of a website where users never have access to the code. The potential Greasemonkey restriction is also rather worrying. | |
| Jan 22, 2010 at 17:45 | history | asked | Brian Campbell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |