Timeline for Accept rate usefulness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 18, 2012 at 21:17 | history | suggested | torrential coding | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected "question" to "answer"
|
| Mar 18, 2012 at 21:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 18, 2012 at 21:17 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2010 at 17:50 | comment | added | George Stocker | @synetech inc. I don't know how it is on superuser, but on Stack Overflow, it's very rare to come across a problem that no one else has ever seen. If you can't get your problem solved, that's an indication that there's something wrong with the question. | |
| Jan 30, 2010 at 17:30 | comment | added | Synetech | Just because nobody can come up with an answer to a question does not mean that no answer exists. I have a really low accept rate on SuperUser because the only time I ask others for help is when I cannot figure it out for myself, and those are usually really bizarre, esoteric, who-the-heck-even-thinks-of-that? type of questions. As such, I rarely accept answers because nobody can give a good one, but that does not mean that no such answer exists in the whole wide world. Though, I do make sure to respond to offered answers to explain why they don’t work. | |
| Jan 30, 2010 at 16:35 | history | answered | George Stocker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |