Timeline for Should support of any invasion be considered intimidation and harassment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2022 at 9:13 | comment | added | Cerbrus | Okay, instead of repeating your comment about my bad example, please clarify your answer. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 9:12 | comment | added | terdon | @Cerbrus yes I am against pretty much any armed conflict but the post does focus more on invasions. I am not against using military personnel for non violent actions, obviously, so talking about soldiers helping with vaccination drives is irrelevant. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 8:59 | comment | added | Cerbrus | "any military action" "stand against war in general" "we ban anything that can be taken as supporting military action" "any <...> armed conflict" Your answer isn't nearly as focused on invasions alone as you claim it is, terdon. Forest's point still stands, your answer could do with being a little more specific. | |
| Mar 21, 2022 at 8:33 | comment | added | terdon | @Cerbrus as you correctly point out that is indeed pedantic. And wrong. Military involvement does not make something a military action. If you and forest want to go nitpicking and focus on a single sentence referring to military action in general instead of reading the entire post which clearly focuses on invasions, that's your choice but if at all possible please don't comment about it. | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 21:48 | comment | added | forest distrusts StackExchange | I'd replace "supporting military action period" with "supporting military invasions period" because not all military actions are about taking over land or overpowering another country. | |
| Mar 20, 2022 at 14:42 | history | answered | terdon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |