Skip to main content
-F-or :)
Source Link
Spevacus Mod
  • 29.4k
  • 9
  • 61
  • 148

I'm of the acute position that if someone elects to blatantly copy an answer from Stack Overflow, then they're already not testing for accessibility.

We already don't issue any warranty for the code we submit in answers, and we don't guarantee it fit orfor any purpose. WhyWhy should we change this by adding something for accessibility in answers? Then we're stating that it's fit for some purpose!

I'm of the acute position that if someone elects to blatantly copy an answer from Stack Overflow, then they're already not testing for accessibility.

We already don't issue any warranty for the code we submit in answers, and we don't guarantee it fit or any purpose. Why should we change this by adding something for accessibility in answers? Then we're stating that it's fit for some purpose!

I'm of the acute position that if someone elects to blatantly copy an answer from Stack Overflow, then they're already not testing for accessibility.

We already don't issue any warranty for the code we submit in answers, and we don't guarantee it fit for any purpose. Why should we change this by adding something for accessibility in answers? Then we're stating that it's fit for some purpose!

Source Link
Makoto
  • 58.3k
  • 19
  • 101
  • 219

I'm of the acute position that if someone elects to blatantly copy an answer from Stack Overflow, then they're already not testing for accessibility.

We already don't issue any warranty for the code we submit in answers, and we don't guarantee it fit or any purpose. Why should we change this by adding something for accessibility in answers? Then we're stating that it's fit for some purpose!