Timeline for The Stack Exchange reputation system: What's working? What's not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2023 at 19:25 | comment | added | benc | @Tomerikoo - looking at your rep, you got the 2K I'm working towards. How happy are you that you can create tags and work the edit queue? Which do you think is more useful? Do you think that, until you had gotten your last 200 and 700 rep, were you qualified for each priv? | |
| Mar 16, 2023 at 19:23 | comment | added | benc |
@Tomerikoo - I admit its kind of a logical fallacy to wave around my seniority (dunno where my beta badges went), but wanted to highlight that meta discussions often are tonally too meta, and have lost the history of the reputation score. To add more color: the reason I'm complaining about this, I got tired of bookmarking Q's to edit later, because the edit queue is full, and I can't help with it.
|
|
| Mar 15, 2023 at 22:30 | comment | added | rallg | It very clearly answers the question. After all what is reputation for? What does it do? Why earn it? The answer is directly to the point. | |
| Mar 15, 2023 at 10:57 | comment | added | Tomerikoo | Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how that actually answers the question. This feels more like a user-experience-report, but there is no mention of the things asked in the question (What is really great about our reputation, What is broken about it, What other systems work really well) | |
| Mar 15, 2023 at 7:02 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 15, 2023 at 7:23 | |||||
| Mar 15, 2023 at 6:42 | history | answered | benc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |