Timeline for Should dissenting answers on new policy posts be deleted by staff?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 at 9:52 | comment | added | ꓢPArcheon | The issue is that the description for the [tag: mod-agreement-policy] is as clear as a starless sky seen thru a glass of ink while being drunk. Currently trying to get it edited to be more explicit. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 1:07 | history | rollback | SpevacusMod |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| May 31, 2023 at 1:06 | history | rollback | SpevacusMod |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| May 31, 2023 at 1:05 | history | rollback | SpevacusMod |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| May 31, 2023 at 1:05 | history | edited | SpevacusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 0:57 | comment | added | terdon | I don't think anyone was approached privately either, @ThomasOwens. They did that with the new CoC, but those who were approached later had no issue discussing that publicly, and I doubt anyone would remain silent about it now given the outrage. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:55 | comment | added | Thomas Owens | Your edit is very consistent with what I saw. Again, I'm not sure if any mods were approached privately or if there were things that were not notified. But yes, the only push notification to mods was an early preview of the policy change. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:52 | comment | added | Spevacus Mod | @ThomasOwens Right, my mistake on the wording. It does seem more like an edict than a.... Proposal of a policy change. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:52 | history | edited | SpevacusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 40 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 0:24 | comment | added | Thomas Owens | Moderators were not, as far as I ever saw, provided an opportunity to give feedback or participate in discussions prior to the policy being crafted. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:00 | history | answered | SpevacusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |