Timeline for When posting announcements either post them as QUESTIONS so that people can actually answer or make the entire thread LOCKED if no input is wanted
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 at 7:59 | comment | added | starball | yeah I was surprised when my answer post got deleted because it was my first time seeing a mod-agreement-policy Q&A (ok I've seen past ones, but never deleted answers on them since I'm under 10k rep right now). It's my first rodeo, but there's no way it's the CMs' first rodeo. In my mind, they should've known to lock out answers from being postable right after posting the Q&A. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 16:24 | history | edited | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 547 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 16:13 | history | edited | cocomac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I'm the OP of that question, having it linked might be easier for readers
|
| May 31, 2023 at 13:46 | history | edited | bobble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor typos
|
| May 31, 2023 at 12:52 | comment | added | Mithical | @Sha - Good point, I was remembering when the announcements tag was special cased | |
| May 31, 2023 at 12:03 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Also, they are interested to hear from us, but they just take what they want from it, and never responding to things that make them uncomfortable. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 12:01 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @hkotsubo I've been saying the later point for long long time, even almost got suspended for that. Now when this explodes in everyone's face, I can finally say "Hah! Told you so!". | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:57 | history | edited | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 31, 2023 at 11:51 | comment | added | hkotsubo | My impression is that "not interested in hearing from you" seems to be the current company's policy. Along with "sometimes we pretend we want to listen, but all feedback will be ignored and we'll do whatever we had already planned" | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:47 | comment | added | ꓢPArcheon | @CodyGray while I didn't realize that locking the post would also prevent voting, I see that as a feature. If the whole idea is to show that "we don't care about your voice or feedback", voting is useless too. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:46 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Mithical the announcements tag wiki says "For questions about Stack Exchange announcements" and this question is about announcements, why did you remove the tag? | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:27 | history | edited | Mithical |
edited tags
|
|
| May 31, 2023 at 11:24 | comment | added | Cody Gray | You don't want it locked, as that would prevent voting. Currently, there is no tool that would lock a question from receiving answers but not other interactions such as voting. (Well, there's closing, but... that'd be even weirder.) Ah, I guess you cover that, though, with the "new type of lock". Did you know there's an emoji specifically to convey this sentiment? | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:22 | history | edited | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 752 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 31, 2023 at 11:11 | history | edited | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 614 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 11:11 | comment | added | Tinkeringbell Mod | It is also not unusual to post both the policy (in question form) ánd a discussion post, and link the two: meta.stackexchange.com/q/336364/369802 | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:10 | history | edited | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 614 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2023 at 11:02 | history | asked | ꓢPArcheon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |