Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2023 at 21:37 comment added Nij There is definitely not a consensus that this policy is due and only applicable to a single politician, and there is no good evidence to think so, given the enormous issues of misinformation occurring around the world. It makes just as much sense to claim the policy is due and applicable to the actions of Russian, Chinese, Indian, UK, Brazilian, Turkish, or Australian people..
Jun 4, 2023 at 17:12 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 17:07 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body; edited body; added 13 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 17:01 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
Add To Be Clear section
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:57 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 191 characters in body; added 124 characters in body; added 10 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:51 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 10 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:43 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 12 characters in body; added 84 characters in body; deleted 22 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:36 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
Add examples
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:12 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
[Edit removed during grace period]; added 10 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:06 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 124 characters in body; added 21 characters in body; added 4 characters in body; added 264 characters in body; deleted 15 characters in body; edited body
Jun 4, 2023 at 13:01 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 21 characters in body; added 521 characters in body
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:53 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
Respond to Richard
Jun 4, 2023 at 11:12 comment added NoDataDumpNoContribution Maybe we need a few explanations, examples for every point in the new code of conduct either as part of the codex or as appendix. It seems to be quite unclear. One could probably ask similar questions about other points of it as well.
Jun 4, 2023 at 6:20 comment added MisterMiyagi As a non-US person, it is really weird to see the US and even "specific US politician" sticker tagged onto this. There seems to be nothing in the CoC that suggests this (to non-US people?) and I don’t see why it would not be taken at face value by people.
Jun 4, 2023 at 4:25 comment added Sam Ginrich Title seems to address fundamental problems of Democracies, free press, free expression of opinion and people abusing these like Hitler's "Volksempfänger", but actually just addresses "Chump" and Richard and Jan. 6. :(
Jun 3, 2023 at 8:45 answer added tripleee timeline score: 5
Jun 2, 2023 at 15:41 comment added tripleee Because systems of governance which are based on public elections are more directly vulnerable to manipulation of public opinion. Perhaps also because oligarchies (including autocracies etc) are less worthy of defense or support by anyone who subscribes to principles of modern Western democracy.
Jun 2, 2023 at 11:41 comment added Thomas Owens Similar questions were raised prior to the Code of Conduct being released and I never saw an answer to them (although I think it was asked in multiple places, so maybe this was addressed in one and not in others). A more fundamental question would be why harm to democracies is worthy of being called out, but not aristocracies, oligarchies, autocracies, or other forms of government.
Jun 2, 2023 at 10:14 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 29 characters in body; added 8 characters in body
Jun 2, 2023 at 10:08 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
added 418 characters in body; added 18 characters in body; added 32 characters in body; edited body; added 2 characters in body
Jun 2, 2023 at 10:01 history asked Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0