Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 8, 2023 at 18:47 comment added Victor Stafusa And the person who poster this answer was then suspended. Great job, SE!
Jun 15, 2023 at 20:56 history edited Starship CC BY-SA 4.0
Clarity
Jun 7, 2023 at 10:16 comment added BryKKan @ShadowWizardStrikesBack I see no reason why it would not be binding. They made a firm commitment about media statements, and recieved significant free moderation services in return. Sounds a lot like a contract to me. At the very least, it's a solid rational basis for demonstrating one of the key requirements for a defamation case. Either way, it's utterly ridiculous to talk about liability and the "binding" nature of policies here. Regardless of legal obligation, they do have a clear moral/social obligation, and criticism of their failure to meet that is fully valid.
Jun 6, 2023 at 15:31 comment added ꓢPArcheon It is also worth noticing that the previous attempt at disparaging someone publicly didn't exactly go well.
Jun 6, 2023 at 13:13 history edited This_is_NOT_a_forum CC BY-SA 4.0
Active reading [<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/address#Verb> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/repeatedly#Adverb>].
Jun 6, 2023 at 9:43 comment added Starship What I am saying is please follow your own policy, not you are legally obliged to @ShadowWizardStrikesBack
Jun 6, 2023 at 9:42 comment added Shadow Wizard While true, it's not a democracy. The policy does not apply to, and is not binding, the company itself, we have no case here.
Jun 6, 2023 at 9:28 history answered Starship CC BY-SA 4.0