Skip to main content
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
Mast
  • 6.8k
  • 4
  • 26
  • 48

As a moderator, I'd be against having access to this information.

Numerous concerns have been raised in the comments (and other answers) already, but it boils down to two reasons why this is a bad idea:

  1. It does not fix the problem at hand.
  2. Much of the information in there is none of our concern at all.

This very much reminds me of an XY problem with nasty side-effects.

As a moderator, I'd be against having access to this information.

Numerous concerns have been raised in the comments already, but it boils down to two reasons why this is a bad idea:

  1. It does not fix the problem at hand.
  2. Much of the information in there is none of our concern at all.

This very much reminds me of an XY problem with nasty side-effects.

As a moderator, I'd be against having access to this information.

Numerous concerns have been raised in the comments (and other answers) already, but it boils down to two reasons why this is a bad idea:

  1. It does not fix the problem at hand.
  2. Much of the information in there is none of our concern at all.

This very much reminds me of an XY problem with nasty side-effects.

Source Link
Mast
  • 6.8k
  • 4
  • 26
  • 48

As a moderator, I'd be against having access to this information.

Numerous concerns have been raised in the comments already, but it boils down to two reasons why this is a bad idea:

  1. It does not fix the problem at hand.
  2. Much of the information in there is none of our concern at all.

This very much reminds me of an XY problem with nasty side-effects.