Return to Question

Does Stack Exchange suspend users solely for striking or supporting the strike? Of course, users who are on strike could still be suspended for unrelated activities, or for promoting the strike in unacceptable ways, but is SE suspending users because they are on strike?

Does Stack Exchange suspend users solely for striking or supporting the strike? Of course, users who are on strike could still be suspended for unrelated activities, or for promoting the strike in unacceptable ways, but is SE suspending users because they are on strike?

Does Stack Exchange suspend users solely for striking or supporting the strike? Of course, users who are on strike could still be suspended for unrelated activities, or for promoting the strike in unacceptable ways, but is SE suspending users because they are on strike?

Does Stack Exchange suspend users solely for striking or supporting the strike? Of course, users who are on strike could still be suspended for unrelated activities, or for promoting the strike in unacceptable ways, but is SE suspending users because they are on strike?

A user who is on strike has been suspended network-wide for a year. Of course, it is entirely possible that the user did something entirely unrelated to the strike, or expressed support for the strike in a clearly unacceptable way. I just want to make sure that SE is not suspending users solely for supporting the strike?

Does Stack Exchange suspend users solely for striking or supporting the strike? Of course, users who are on strike could still be suspended for unrelated activities, or for promoting the strike in unacceptable ways, but is SE suspending users because they are on strike?