Timeline for Does the Share-alike clause of the content license mean software code content can't be used other than in open-source software?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2023 at 11:30 | comment | added | matanox | @vandench just noting that it seems your comment is literally opposite to the answer below. I'd consider removing it if the answer below were correct as it seems it is. | |
| Aug 10, 2023 at 3:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 10, 2023 at 10:53 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2023 at 9:22 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @KarlKnechtel The MIT license was never adopted (and couldn't have been retroactively anyway for previous content). The company came never back and dropped the idea. I don't see how it's relevant for any current situation. | |
| Aug 9, 2023 at 5:16 | answer | added | mjy | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 5, 2023 at 17:44 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | Does this answer your question? The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange | |
| Aug 5, 2023 at 9:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 5, 2023 at 14:11 | |||||
| Aug 5, 2023 at 4:46 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | Maybe try Open Source for this? | |
| Aug 4, 2023 at 23:09 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://stackoverflow.design/brand/copywriting/naming/>].
|
| Aug 4, 2023 at 17:07 | history | asked | matanox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |