Timeline for Our Design Vision for Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2023 at 10:40 | comment | added | Robert M. | @starball In response to piper's response, I asked why the design team is working on this alone. Aren't there developers? Couldn't they be evolved? "We're just designers and can't address technical debt," raises more questions than it answers IMO. | |
| Aug 12, 2023 at 8:28 | history | edited | vas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Aug 12, 2023 at 3:41 | history | edited | vas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2023 at 1:15 | comment | added | starball | I am very much with this request, but just in case you haven't seen it, please see piper's comment here: meta.stackexchange.com/q/392048/392202#comment1311532_392069. | |
| Aug 12, 2023 at 1:10 | comment | added | vas | @starball trust me, i am. But that feels like a game of wack-a-mole. Something like A proposal for tag hierarchy might make filtering much better. There is so much noise. I'm not trivializing the problem; I know search, filtering and ranking are the Internet's biggest problem (covering even things like "fake news" and AI-generated junk). But I think SO can find a focused solution that works for it. | |
| Aug 12, 2023 at 1:00 | comment | added | starball | you might benefit from being more aggressive with your ignored tags | |
| Aug 12, 2023 at 0:42 | history | answered | vas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |