Timeline for Sites can now request to enable a banner to warn about their policy on AI-generated content
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
36 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22 at 12:06 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 376 characters in body
|
| Feb 7 at 16:32 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 276 characters in body
|
| Feb 6 at 15:10 | history | edited | RosieStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 5 at 1:48 | comment | added | Joe W | @JNat Thank you for that update, it clears up my confusion. | |
| Feb 1 at 3:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 1 at 5:52 | |||||
| Jan 31 at 17:07 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2202 characters in body
|
| Jan 26 at 9:01 | comment | added | Harikrishnan M | Not only that. I would like to suggest that SE partner up with an AI-content checker tool so that we will be able to prevent the content from popping up. | |
| Jan 25 at 0:13 | comment | added | 0-One-0 | @JNat Thank you, I had read this before, so I gather it means "attribution" (to the AI). But it does not seem to include the attribution the AI might provide (accurately or not) to the content it is outputting. Furthermore consider a X network user quoting content from SE with attribution and an AI being trained on this. It is not clear how the AI would attribute output based on this, but that's another question altogether. | |
| Jan 24 at 3:19 | answer | added | elemtilas | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jan 23 at 11:09 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | Does this answer answer your question, @Plusjamaisquoiencore? If not, I'd propose creating a separate question to ask for clarification on it, as the comment section here is a bit inadequate to go into any more detail than that answer already provides. | |
| Jan 22 at 18:21 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | That is a good point, @JoeW — there might've been some crossed wires with communications here, internally. Gonna determine next steps internally and update once we have 'em. Thanks for pointing that out. | |
| Jan 17 at 19:47 | comment | added | Joe W | I am a little confused about the second option for requiring AI answers to be cited when another answer from a staff member suggests that answers that do not cite AI answers are violating the code of conduct. meta.stackexchange.com/a/393682 | |
| Jan 15 at 16:18 | answer | added | Doc Brown | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 11 at 19:40 | comment | added | Akixkisu | A banner would be great if it pops up only when and if one copies a chunk of characters. With this implementation, I worry that it would have the same effect as telling people that adblockers are forbidden — it notifies them that they are an option respectively. We shouldn't continuously notify people about AI options, but we should clarify our stance when we encounter a possible infringement — when someone copies and pastes their answer. | |
| Jan 10 at 15:59 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
lowercasing "Artificial Intelligence;" status update about graduating experiment
|
| Jan 10 at 11:10 | comment | added | ouflak | It's not really artificial intelligence (which would be an incredible technological and sociological breakthrough). I do hope we get to have a say in the wording on our site if we go for this. | |
| Jan 6 at 15:09 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor | @ElEctric Not all SE sites have agreed to ban AI-generated content, and even among those that have, some implement it more strictly than others. There isn't a unified network policy on this, hence no unified network banner. | |
| Jan 6 at 10:44 | comment | added | user314962 | Make this mandatory across all SE sites. Please. | |
| Jan 6 at 5:15 | comment | added | Largato | "All users will see this banner when posting an answer with the option to dismiss. Once dismissed, logged-in users will not see this banner again" probably this should require something like 20 points to be dismissable. But I'm just "thinking too loud". | |
| Jan 5 at 20:27 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified link description (for accessibility; "here" alone is not a useful description of the link's destination)
|
| Jan 5 at 20:18 | answer | added | cocomac | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jan 5 at 20:16 | comment | added | Levente | Hi, I present an observation regarding the placement of this banner and the corresponding effect. (The choice of the specific placement (inside the textarea) may end up contributing to an accusatory and distressing experience). I have already posted it in the AskUbuntu meta, I request that you look at it and consider it: meta.askubuntu.com/a/20408/1157519 | |
| Jan 5 at 19:32 | answer | added | Michael Seifert | timeline score: 41 | |
| Jan 5 at 17:37 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a screenshot of the banner on SO, for ease of access
|
| Jan 5 at 17:28 | history | edited | zcoop98 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Convert headings to formal heading syntax
|
| Jan 5 at 16:18 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified request process
|
| Jan 5 at 16:09 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | Not all sites have a policy about AI-generated content (as far as I'm aware), @AndreasmovedtoCodidact, so the separate discussions ensure that each community has a policy that suits their own needs, and that proper guidance and documentation of that policy is created as a part of that process. Hopefully my latest edit makes that a bit clearer. | |
| Jan 5 at 16:07 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 402 characters in body
|
| Jan 5 at 16:02 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 5 at 14:29 | comment | added | Andreas condemns Israel | I’m curious as to the reason for requiring a new discussion for each site, about these banners, instead of just simply enabling them for sites which have banned AI-generated content. That is, the first paragraph for sites which have banned it, and the second one for the remaining sites. | |
| Jan 5 at 12:44 | comment | added | Laurel | I'm a bit disappointed that we're stuck with pre-generated options, because I would love to also briefly mention the other rules of the site on such a banner (e.g., be thorough, don't plagiarize). | |
| Jan 5 at 11:30 | history | edited | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified title
|
| Jan 5 at 11:29 | comment | added | JNat StaffMod | Request it on that site's Meta, as per the last paragraph, and escalate it to the CM Team ;) | |
| Jan 5 at 11:20 | answer | added | αλεχολυτ | timeline score: 48 | |
| Jan 5 at 11:08 | comment | added | HolyBlackCat | If there's consensus on a per-site meta that we want the banner, what needs to be done to enable it? E.g. on ruSO. | |
| Jan 5 at 10:43 | history | asked | JNatStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |