Timeline for Can we have a badge called "big spender" or "seeder"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 22, 2010 at 19:34 | comment | added | bitbonk | The motivation behind an answer does not matter. It is the answer that matters. We should definately encourage people to give away their reputation to people who deserve it. | |
Feb 22, 2010 at 19:30 | comment | added | bitbonk | Additionally when you put your reputation on a unanswered question in most cases the quality of the anwsers improve greatly and become much more detailed. This serves us all and our posterity!! | |
Feb 22, 2010 at 19:27 | comment | added | bitbonk | Giving away your reputation points to someone who might have put a lot of effort and even time can be considered as good behavior I would say. | |
Feb 22, 2010 at 10:44 | comment | added | HorusKol | how about awarding the badge after the person has accepted an answer to a bounty question? and many badges seem to be awarded for activities that could be considered 'good behaviour' - but can just be 'played', like the badge for editing your own question or comment... | |
Feb 20, 2010 at 22:39 | comment | added | BinaryMisfit | @Fearless. Lolz. Yeah that would make it even more detailed. | |
Feb 20, 2010 at 22:29 | comment | added | mmx | @Diago: Should they enable the "Continue" button only after you've scrolled down to the bottom? :) | |
Feb 20, 2010 at 17:59 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
|
Feb 20, 2010 at 17:55 | comment | added | BinaryMisfit | +1 When a bounty is started it should show a bounty agreement screen that lists the above plus a description of what happens if the bounty should expire. Then again I can't remember if it does already do this. | |
Feb 20, 2010 at 17:52 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 2.5 |