Timeline for Please, I want some more HTML
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26 at 0:08 | comment | added | VainMan |
Another potential use of <details> is to cite and collapse a long text from external link which might get expired or modified in the future.
|
|
| Sep 5 at 16:37 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @ShadowWizard There's a workaround for that. I don't know whether the vote reversal script applies to CW answers: you can get badges from them, so I assume it still does. | |
| Sep 5 at 15:01 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @ShadowWizard That's a good point. At least two sets of upvotes have been discarded by the serial voting script. I'll investigate. | |
| Sep 5 at 11:59 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | I mean because it's a poll, where you post all answers. I don't feel comfortable to vote in such a case (either up or down) plus it can trigger serial voting scripts. (Which I want to believe won't run for votes on CW) | |
| Sep 5 at 1:55 | comment | added | Tsundoku |
One of the potential uses of details and summary is a replacement for the current spoiler implementation, which is inaccessible to keyboard-only users.
|
|
| Sep 4 at 17:06 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @ShadowWizard I'm using the first person, and not asking for collaboration on the answers. Per The Future of Community Wiki, I don't think CW is appropriate here. (The question should ideally be Community Wiki, but that has side effects which aren't appropriate, due to the original (now deprecated) conception of CW.) | |
| Sep 4 at 17:00 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Please mark your answers here as CW. | |
| Sep 4 at 16:04 | history | answered | wizzwizz4 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |