Timeline for Should we have a policy about "too much downvoting"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:15 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | I have 302, but with 1982 upvotes that's a ratio of 6.56. You have a ratio of 2.37, so you're in no danger. It's only for extreme cases. | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:11 | comment | added | Tyler Carter | @Lance My reasoning still stands valid. But, I will update it to reflect that. | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:10 | history | edited | Tyler Carter | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 184 characters in body; deleted 173 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:09 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | He's saying 'vote (n) times' meaning that it won't affect anybody until after they have a certain number of votes in the system. After that they have to have a good ratio to downvote. | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 0:03 | history | answered | Tyler Carter | CC BY-SA 2.5 |