Timeline for Should the weight of question upvotes be reduced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2010 at 20:52 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | @Jeff, thanks, now I'll finally get to see those 10k tools. I don't mind the 5pts/question, just didn't like the retro. | |
| Mar 20, 2010 at 9:30 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @lance we will keep +10 / +10 on meta | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 17:58 | comment | added | Ether | I disagree; good discussions and feature requests on meta tend to be rewarded with a lot of upvotes, so applying the same change here should not have a calamatous effect on reputation. (Keep in mind there are still lots of n00b questions here too, which do deserve to be affected the same as on SO.) | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 17:28 | comment | added | mmx | +1 On meta, upvotes on answers ("Yes, I agree") worth less than questions. | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:52 | comment | added | Lance Roberts | I'm bummed out that I'm days away from 10k on Meta. It was in sight. | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 13:55 | comment | added | Kip | (i'm really miffed that i'm probably going to go below 10k on meta) | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 13:54 | comment | added | Kip | i agree. on SO, questions will come naturally, but answers need to be encouraged. on Meta, it's kind of the opposite: good feature request ideas or good bug finds should be rewarded, while the "answers" are just discussion that will happen naturally | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 11:32 | history | answered | juan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |