Timeline for Reputation for editing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 19, 2010 at 18:38 | comment | added | Bill the Lizard Mod | I'm sure you're right that it would increase disagreements and complaints (as we're seeing lately, almost any change does). The problem with badges for editing is that it rewards simple volume. Reputation (based on voting for individual edits) would reward quality. I think it might also discourage pointless edits that people often make just to get a badge. Anyway, thanks a lot for volunteering your time to edit posts even without incentive! :) | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 18:21 | comment | added | Gnome | @Bill: Ideally. It'd also increase disagreements and complaints, too. I'm only reluctantly against it (but then again, I'd be someone getting rep/badges and not having to deal with complaints), and this is more stating my view on the matter as a whole than suggesting a course of action. | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 18:11 | comment | added | Bill the Lizard Mod | Wouldn't upvotes (and I presume downvotes) for individual edits promote more good edits, though? | |
| Mar 19, 2010 at 16:54 | history | answered | Gnome | CC BY-SA 2.5 |