Timeline for Can we get a confirmation that flagging a post for spam has worked?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2010 at 4:13 | vote | accept | Pops | ||
| Dec 2, 2010 at 3:45 | answer | added | Jarrod Dixon | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 2, 2010 at 3:43 | history | edited | Jarrod Dixon |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 4, 2010 at 23:29 | history | edited | Pops | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
expanded request to the remaining category of flag
|
| May 11, 2010 at 19:28 | comment | added | juan | @mmy meta.stackexchange.com/questions/48165/… | |
| May 11, 2010 at 18:38 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | @mmyers It has had a delayed effect on the vote count (quite significantly delayed as has been reported), but I was never aware of any time that it was fully removed. | |
| May 11, 2010 at 18:29 | comment | added | mmyers Mod | @Down: Last I checked, it didn't affect the vote number on the left (but it did affect reputation). Is that not the case? | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:55 | comment | added | Pops | @Jon, I'm less excited about the proposals in that second link. Once I flag something, there's really nothing more I can do, whether the mods take any action or not. So, I see no reason keep track of/follow up on stuff I flag. As for the first link, I admit that my search-fu failed me, mea culpa. | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:52 | comment | added | juan | @mmy, it does count as a -1 | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:48 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/16720/… | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:46 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | Related/duplicate: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/37147/… | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:45 | comment | added | mmyers Mod | Yeah, now that flagging no longer causes a -1, the only way to tell (other than flagging again) is the 10k tools. | |
| May 11, 2010 at 17:41 | history | asked | Pops | CC BY-SA 2.5 |