Timeline for Question deletions are getting out of hand
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
May 25, 2010 at 0:37 | comment | added | John Saunders | +1. And I think we need a better process for requesting merges, and seeing that they get done. Right now, it just seems a waste of my time. Fix that, and I'll be glad to give special treatment to duplicates. | |
May 24, 2010 at 19:42 | comment | added | Bill the Lizard | @John: You've earned that right. I do think that questions closed as duplicates need a separate set of deletion criteria than all the other close reasons. | |
May 24, 2010 at 19:31 | comment | added | John Saunders | Bill, this has been discussed elsewhere. I've stated that I'd be glad to follow some alternate process for duplicates - once someone can show me what the process is, and that the process works. Otherwise, I'll depend on my own judgement, and others can affect my judgement through comments. | |
May 24, 2010 at 19:19 | history | answered | Bill the Lizard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |